You tell us a goal. Like making sure everyone's on track for launch.
We create personalized questions for each team member that cover what they would normally share in a meeting.
Everyone has a short conversation with our AI agent. We ask questions and follow-ups. No calendar coordination.
We analyze the conversations together, finding everything relevant to share with the group.
Everyone gets a quick recap and personalized action items.
Ask questions across conversations from multiple Syncs. See recurring themes, check status, and get insights from everyone.
Find out how people understand the strategy, where their interpretations diverge, and what is getting lost as the vision moves through the company.
Explore the use case →Collect candid operating context from the people closest to the work and turn it into one readable view of risks, friction, and opportunity.
Explore the use case →Replace recurring information-gathering meetings with short asynchronous conversations that produce a clearer shared brief.
Explore the use case →Translate the operating principles behind meeting-light leaders into a repeatable listening system your own company can use.
Explore the use case →Replace status-heavy product rituals with targeted conversations that preserve nuance and expose the questions a live decision actually needs.
Explore the use case →See what teams actually understood, committed to, and changed after the alignment meeting ended.
Explore the use case →Combine product and sales conversations to expose mismatched promises, missing market context, and the few decisions both teams need to make together.
Explore the use case →Collect progress, blockers, and changed assumptions asynchronously, then bring people together only when a problem needs real collaboration.
Explore the use case →Keep stakeholders informed without repeatedly breaking the long, uninterrupted blocks engineers need for difficult work.
Explore the use case →Remove low-value coordination load and give engineers more control over when they communicate and when they concentrate.
Explore the use case →Give every new hire a private, timely conversation and turn their answers into an actionable view of the onboarding experience.
Explore the use case →Go beyond pulse scores with guided conversations that explain what people feel, why they feel it, and what would make the greatest difference.
Explore the use case →Turn an abstract AI mandate into an improvement every employee can feel: fewer status meetings and better information.
Explore the use case →Add structured, contextual conversation data to the knowledge systems that otherwise see documents and outcomes but miss the reasoning between them.
Explore the use case →$3 per conversation. So replacing an engineering standup with 6 people would be $18.
Agreed. The point isn’t to replace every single meeting — just many of them. Having Syncs replace your lower-value meetings means the ones left over are more effective.
We can — but don’t overthink it. Just try it out: sign up and we’ll invite you to a Sync so you can see for yourself.
We include relevant background information from the person creating the Sync and from previous conversations. We also use a playbook of proven questions designed to surface the information you need. Our agents analyze each response and ask follow-up questions when needed.